Rule of Law
- Description
- Reviews
- Citation
- Cataloging
- Transcript
RULE OF LAW shares the story of a newly-disabled outlaw in rural Tennessee whose local court case on minor traffic violations evolves into a landmark class action lawsuit before the U.S. Supreme Court where the rights of 55 million people and the Americans with Disabilities Act itself are at stake. A lawyer from one of the smallest counties in the country represents the outlaw and takes it to the highest court in the land to debate issues of sovereign immunity and due process.
It reveals how questions of civil rights affecting a broad spectrum of people can arise out of the most unlikely sources, how a good lawyer should never ignore any client and should look for constitutional issues in whatever thorny problems his/her clients have, how slow the legal system is, how unresponsive government lawyers can sometimes be and how anyone, no matter what their history, along with a single small-town lawyer can work together to help millions of people.
'Compelling...Rule of Law illustrates the human dimensions of the case as well as describing a complex doctrinal case in ways that are understandable to legal experts and novices alike. The links to key documents in the case, as well as related documents and supplemental interviews, make this an important resource for law professors, law students, disability rights advocates, and people with disabilities themselves. It is an invaluable teaching resource.' Robert Dinerstein, Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Experiential Education, Director, Disability Rights Law Clinic, American University
'Rule of Law provides a rich and thoughtful portrait of an important case in the disability rights movement. Looking deeply into the human and strategic considerations, it will be of use to students and teachers in a variety of disciplines.' Michael Waterstone, Dean and Senior Vice President, Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University
'Excellent film...demonstrates that the ADA remains unfinished business...Rule of Law is educational and inspiring, showing students the role all of us must play in remaining vigilant in our advocacy for equality for persons with disabilities.' Dr. Stephen Meyers, Assistant Professor of Law, Societies, and Justice, University of Washington
'Rule of Law is the story of how a man with one leg and a small town lawyer reminded the American legal system that the most fundamental of all American rights is the right of a person 'to stand up.' While this film provides valuable background on the evolution of a leading civil rights case, it most importantly reminds us that we can only judge a law when we are confronted by its impact on human life.' Greg Randall Lee, Professor of Law, Widener University
'Rule of Law is such an important story of how everyday people can change the world for the better. Watch how one man fights for his legal rights, how the legal system treats him throughout that fight, and how a country lawyer stands by him for years, successfully enforcing the law for the benefit of 50+ million people with disabilities. A must-see for anyone who is a fan - or critic - of American democracy.' Christopher H. Knauf, Esq., Civil rights attorney, Knauf Associates
'Rule of Law preserves the important history of much of Tennessee v. Lane, a watershed case about the fundamental right of access to courts for all Americans. This one-hour documentary will be useful for educators, policy makers, law makers, and anyone interested in the civil rights litigation supporting the Americans with Disabilities Act.' Dr. Ani Satz, Professor of Law, Professor of Public Health, Emory University
Citation
Main credits
Iacovella, Dan (film director)
Iacovella, Dan (film producer)
Iacovella, Dan (screenwriter)
Allen, Jamie Leigh (narrator)
Other credits
Directors of photography: Dan Iacovella & Ash Wright; editor: Dan Iacovella.
Distributor subjects
American Democracy; American Studies; Citizenship and Civics; Civil Rights; Community; Constitutional Law; Disabilities; Disability Rights; Government; Health; History; Human Rights; Law; SociologyKeywords
00:00:01.519 --> 00:00:03.060
- The Americans with
Disabilities Act
00:00:03.060 --> 00:00:09.780
is not about doing special
things for disabled people.
00:00:09.780 --> 00:00:16.090
It is about our country and our
government making sure that all
00:00:16.090 --> 00:00:19.750
citizens, no matter
their circumstances,
00:00:19.750 --> 00:00:25.030
being able to participate freely
in one of the most important
00:00:25.030 --> 00:00:27.161
parts of our democracy --
00:00:27.161 --> 00:00:28.690
the administration of justice.
00:00:32.280 --> 00:00:34.898
So I filed suit.
00:00:34.898 --> 00:00:39.191
(DRAMATIC MUSIC PLAYING)
00:00:41.100 --> 00:00:43.150
- It gave... it gave me purpose.
00:00:43.150 --> 00:00:43.950
What can I say?
00:00:43.950 --> 00:00:45.040
It gave me purpose.
00:00:45.040 --> 00:00:50.480
Because at that time, you
know, I lost my father.
00:00:50.480 --> 00:00:55.770
Two weeks later I lost
my wife, went to prison.
00:00:55.770 --> 00:00:59.340
Five months after that, I
lost my mother, you know.
00:00:59.340 --> 00:01:02.670
And this case kept me
together, you know.
00:01:02.670 --> 00:01:05.700
This case did as much
for me as I did for it.
00:01:05.700 --> 00:01:08.630
And basically all
I was, was a mouth.
00:01:08.630 --> 00:01:12.776
I was a redneck that just could
not understand and demanded
00:01:12.776 --> 00:01:13.276
answers.
00:01:18.520 --> 00:01:20.110
- I had a, um...
00:01:20.110 --> 00:01:25.850
an appointment on my book for
driving on a revoked license.
00:01:25.850 --> 00:01:31.150
And, um, so I went to
escort the client in,
00:01:31.150 --> 00:01:34.080
and they were in a wheelchair.
00:01:34.080 --> 00:01:37.920
- In May 1996, while driving
to his home in Polk County,
00:01:37.920 --> 00:01:41.550
Tennessee, George Lane falls
asleep at the wheel after
00:01:41.550 --> 00:01:44.880
having worked multiple 20-hour
shifts at a Georgia carpet
00:01:44.880 --> 00:01:47.400
factory.
00:01:47.400 --> 00:01:50.490
A head-on collision kills
the driver of another car
00:01:50.490 --> 00:01:51.950
and leaves George in a coma.
00:01:55.180 --> 00:01:58.430
Two weeks later, he awakens.
00:01:58.430 --> 00:02:01.040
- After he had been able
to get out of the hospital,
00:02:01.040 --> 00:02:07.430
they arrested him and had
him make a bond on a Driving
00:02:07.430 --> 00:02:10.160
on a Revoked License charge.
00:02:10.160 --> 00:02:13.490
- In July of that year, George
arrives at the Polk County
00:02:13.490 --> 00:02:16.571
courthouse to face four
minor charges stemming
00:02:16.571 --> 00:02:17.320
from the accident.
00:02:20.005 --> 00:02:22.980
He rolls into the
courthouse in a wheelchair,
00:02:22.980 --> 00:02:25.340
but the courtroom is
on the second floor
00:02:25.340 --> 00:02:28.820
and there's no elevator
in the building.
00:02:28.820 --> 00:02:32.360
- And they basically
sent word back to him
00:02:32.360 --> 00:02:36.260
that he needed to get up
there the best way he could.
00:02:36.260 --> 00:02:39.530
- So George decides to crawl
up the stairs to get to court.
00:02:46.510 --> 00:02:51.890
- And he described, um, how
everybody looked at him,
00:02:51.890 --> 00:02:55.240
stared at him.
00:02:55.240 --> 00:02:59.870
The police officers made
snide remarks about him.
00:02:59.870 --> 00:03:03.725
And how just absolutely,
totally humiliated
00:03:03.725 --> 00:03:07.320
he was by that experience.
00:03:07.320 --> 00:03:09.030
- In spite of the
attention George
00:03:09.030 --> 00:03:12.450
received crawling up the
stairs, once in the courtroom,
00:03:12.450 --> 00:03:16.380
Judge Frank Hammonds does not
call his case all morning, then
00:03:16.380 --> 00:03:18.750
breaks for lunch,
leaving George alone
00:03:18.750 --> 00:03:20.782
in the courtroom with his niece.
00:03:20.782 --> 00:03:26.180
- I'm a man that has...
00:03:26.180 --> 00:03:29.470
I have more than
one disability here.
00:03:29.470 --> 00:03:32.400
I suffer from the
disease of addiction.
00:03:32.400 --> 00:03:36.460
Therefore, you know,
I have had a past.
00:03:36.460 --> 00:03:38.530
I still have this past.
00:03:38.530 --> 00:03:41.415
But this past is what makes
me the man I am today.
00:03:45.780 --> 00:03:48.530
So I've run-ins with
the law and stuff.
00:03:48.530 --> 00:03:49.030
So I'm...
00:03:49.030 --> 00:03:51.090
I'm known in Polk County.
00:03:51.090 --> 00:03:54.660
- Prior to July 1996,
George had appeared
00:03:54.660 --> 00:03:57.630
in the Polk County
courthouse over 20 times
00:03:57.630 --> 00:04:00.880
on drug and alcohol charges.
00:04:00.880 --> 00:04:03.520
He waits for over six
hours in the courthouse
00:04:03.520 --> 00:04:05.950
without access to a
handicapped-accessible
00:04:05.950 --> 00:04:08.620
bathroom, only to
be told his hearing
00:04:08.620 --> 00:04:12.260
date is being rescheduled.
00:04:12.260 --> 00:04:15.235
So he crawls back
down the stairs.
00:04:15.235 --> 00:04:21.660
(DRAMATIC MUSIC PLAYING)
00:04:21.660 --> 00:04:26.280
On October 21, 1996,
when he returns to court,
00:04:26.280 --> 00:04:29.880
George sends word that he
won't crawl up the stairs again
00:04:29.880 --> 00:04:34.150
and asks that he be
accommodated in some other way.
00:04:34.150 --> 00:04:36.680
- They offered to carry
him up the stairs,
00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:41.350
but in light of
the disdain that he
00:04:41.350 --> 00:04:43.060
had been treated
with the last time,
00:04:43.060 --> 00:04:46.630
he said the last thing he
wanted those officers to do
00:04:46.630 --> 00:04:51.679
was to be responsible for
carrying him up those stairs.
00:04:51.679 --> 00:04:54.220
He sent word back that he wasn't
going to crawl up the stairs
00:04:54.220 --> 00:04:58.690
and he would not have
anyone carry him as well.
00:04:58.690 --> 00:05:01.360
And he said a few minutes
later, the officers came down
00:05:01.360 --> 00:05:06.310
and they arrested him and
took him to jail for failure
00:05:06.310 --> 00:05:06.922
to appear.
00:05:09.520 --> 00:05:15.880
He was within probably 30
vertical feet of the place
00:05:15.880 --> 00:05:20.030
where he was accused of not
arriving to appear for court.
00:05:20.030 --> 00:05:23.350
- Yeah, I just thought
it was just wrong --
00:05:23.350 --> 00:05:27.860
and not seeking any recognition
or anything of that sort.
00:05:27.860 --> 00:05:31.900
I just thought that I
could help someone not
00:05:31.900 --> 00:05:34.920
have to go through this again.
00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:37.490
- And so George --
00:05:37.490 --> 00:05:43.010
who I had known in the past
when I was an Assistant DA over
00:05:43.010 --> 00:05:46.460
there and, in fact, had
prosecuted him a number
00:05:46.460 --> 00:05:48.590
of occasions --
00:05:48.590 --> 00:05:53.420
told me that he decided that
he needed to get a lawyer.
00:05:53.420 --> 00:05:56.760
And he'd always respected
the way I'd handled cases.
00:05:56.760 --> 00:06:01.760
And so he asked me to
represent him in that case.
00:06:01.760 --> 00:06:07.340
And I'll never forget,
he asked me in this way
00:06:07.340 --> 00:06:08.440
that only George could.
00:06:08.440 --> 00:06:13.520
He said, he said, "Now,
Bill, isn't there a law that
00:06:13.520 --> 00:06:17.480
says they can't do this to me?"
00:06:17.480 --> 00:06:19.640
And I said, well,
George, there's
00:06:19.640 --> 00:06:22.590
a thing called the Americans
with Disabilities Act,
00:06:22.590 --> 00:06:27.530
and no, I don't think
they can do it to you.
00:06:27.530 --> 00:06:32.920
But the question is whether or
not they can get away with it.
00:06:32.920 --> 00:06:35.050
Because they really have
already done it to you.
00:06:39.650 --> 00:06:42.226
As I had told
George, you know, um,
00:06:42.226 --> 00:06:44.850
I knew there was a thing called
the Americans with Disabilities
00:06:44.850 --> 00:06:45.950
Act.
00:06:45.950 --> 00:06:50.640
But in terms of my professional
knowledge and experience of it,
00:06:50.640 --> 00:06:52.790
it was virtually none.
00:06:52.790 --> 00:06:55.400
- After some quick
research, two days later
00:06:55.400 --> 00:06:58.100
Bill sends a letter to Judge
Hammonds and the County
00:06:58.100 --> 00:07:01.460
Executive saying that the
conditions George faced
00:07:01.460 --> 00:07:04.460
were discriminatory
under the ADA,
00:07:04.460 --> 00:07:06.500
and asked that his
hearing be postponed
00:07:06.500 --> 00:07:09.860
until an elevator could
be put in the courthouse.
00:07:09.860 --> 00:07:13.550
- And I just
continuously received
00:07:13.550 --> 00:07:15.770
the, "Oh, we haven't
got any money for that,
00:07:15.770 --> 00:07:21.200
so uh, we're not
going to do it."
00:07:21.200 --> 00:07:24.740
But, you know, I felt
that it was my obligation
00:07:24.740 --> 00:07:29.060
to give the state of
Tennessee every opportunity
00:07:29.060 --> 00:07:32.060
to meet its obligations
for treating
00:07:32.060 --> 00:07:34.130
George in a reasonable manner.
00:07:34.130 --> 00:07:42.020
So after that, I filed a motion
for an interlocutory appeal.
00:07:42.020 --> 00:07:44.150
- The Tennessee Court
of Ciminal Appeals,
00:07:44.150 --> 00:07:47.960
the State Court of Appeals, and
the Tennessee Supreme Court all
00:07:47.960 --> 00:07:50.390
denied Bill's request
to have George's hearing
00:07:50.390 --> 00:07:52.760
postponed until the
courthouse was brought
00:07:52.760 --> 00:07:56.180
into compliance with the ADA.
00:07:56.180 --> 00:08:00.260
- Now during this whole
process, I had also
00:08:00.260 --> 00:08:02.810
sent a letter to
the Attorney General
00:08:02.810 --> 00:08:05.010
for the State of
Tennessee saying,
00:08:05.010 --> 00:08:10.220
hey, there's this Americans
with Disabilities Act thing,
00:08:10.220 --> 00:08:13.590
and I can't get my client
a reasonable accommodation.
00:08:13.590 --> 00:08:20.030
Would you guys
intervene to at least
00:08:20.030 --> 00:08:23.180
provide my client some
reasonable accommodation
00:08:23.180 --> 00:08:26.370
in his case?
00:08:26.370 --> 00:08:29.600
And I received
absolutely no response.
00:08:29.600 --> 00:08:33.010
It wasn't a, "Dear Mr.
Brown, we're sorry,
00:08:33.010 --> 00:08:35.840
Dear Mr. Brown, go
jump in the lake."
00:08:35.840 --> 00:08:38.480
It was nothing --
00:08:38.480 --> 00:08:39.150
dead silence.
00:08:42.030 --> 00:08:43.850
So I was satisfied
at that point in time
00:08:43.850 --> 00:08:45.308
that the State of
Tennessee was not
00:08:45.308 --> 00:08:49.740
interested in being confronted
with their responsibilities
00:08:49.740 --> 00:08:51.490
under the Americans
with Disabilities Act.
00:08:58.280 --> 00:09:01.290
So after dealing
with that situation,
00:09:01.290 --> 00:09:05.140
it really became a cause for me.
00:09:05.140 --> 00:09:07.540
- This prompts Bill
to think about access
00:09:07.540 --> 00:09:10.090
in other courthouses
around the state.
00:09:10.090 --> 00:09:12.640
- You know, in southeast
Tennessee and small counties...
00:09:12.640 --> 00:09:15.430
you don't just work
in Polk County.
00:09:15.430 --> 00:09:17.740
You work in Bradley County,
you work in McMinn County,
00:09:17.740 --> 00:09:20.980
Meigs County, Hamblen County
-- all over the place.
00:09:20.980 --> 00:09:24.430
And I knew of
multiple counties in
00:09:24.430 --> 00:09:26.860
our general geographical
area that didn't
00:09:26.860 --> 00:09:30.490
have accessible courtrooms.
00:09:30.490 --> 00:09:32.860
So I decided to do a survey.
00:09:32.860 --> 00:09:37.840
- An investigator hired by Bill
finds that 25 of 95 counties --
00:09:37.840 --> 00:09:41.260
or more than one quarter of
all courthouses in Tennessee --
00:09:41.260 --> 00:09:43.480
are in fact inaccessible.
00:09:43.480 --> 00:09:46.090
- By that time, I recognized
that this was really
00:09:46.090 --> 00:09:49.060
a serious problem
throughout the state.
00:09:49.060 --> 00:09:50.270
It wasn't just Polk County.
00:09:50.270 --> 00:09:52.570
It wasn't about just
getting George up there.
00:09:52.570 --> 00:09:56.590
It wasn't about just
building an elevator.
00:09:56.590 --> 00:09:58.280
So we filed suit.
00:09:58.280 --> 00:10:02.170
- Bill sues the State of
Tennessee and the 25 counties
00:10:02.170 --> 00:10:05.410
under Title II of the
ADA, which requires
00:10:05.410 --> 00:10:09.010
that people with disabilities
have equal access to all state
00:10:09.010 --> 00:10:11.830
and local government programs.
00:10:11.830 --> 00:10:14.170
The lawsuit seeks
both injunctive relief
00:10:14.170 --> 00:10:18.070
to make the courthouses
accessible and monetary damages
00:10:18.070 --> 00:10:20.350
for George and five
new plaintiffs brought
00:10:20.350 --> 00:10:24.980
onto the case,
including Beverly Jones.
00:10:24.980 --> 00:10:28.340
- Who was a single
mother who had
00:10:28.340 --> 00:10:35.570
become a paraplegic as a result
of a log truck hitting her.
00:10:35.570 --> 00:10:39.200
And she had gone from
being a person who
00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:44.480
had worked in a factory to
becoming a court reporter,
00:10:44.480 --> 00:10:46.950
because that was a way that
she could support her family.
00:10:46.950 --> 00:10:52.700
And so she confronted all of
these inaccessible courthouses
00:10:52.700 --> 00:10:54.670
in middle Tennessee.
00:10:54.670 --> 00:11:01.600
And in many cases, she had to
ask lawyers and police officers
00:11:01.600 --> 00:11:03.730
to carry her up to
the courtroom so
00:11:03.730 --> 00:11:07.990
that she could do her trade
of being a court reporter.
00:11:07.990 --> 00:11:13.200
So I had this
ironic circumstance
00:11:13.200 --> 00:11:19.310
of this beautiful woman,
salt of the earth,
00:11:19.310 --> 00:11:23.300
victim of a horrible
accident, made a paraplegic
00:11:23.300 --> 00:11:25.610
through no fault of her own.
00:11:25.610 --> 00:11:29.130
And then on the other
hand I had George Lane --
00:11:29.130 --> 00:11:32.370
somewhat of a n'er-do-well,
a person who was held in poor
00:11:32.370 --> 00:11:39.970
repute in Polk County, who
had been disabled as a result
00:11:39.970 --> 00:11:44.620
of his own falling asleep and
had killed another person.
00:11:47.850 --> 00:11:51.860
And so with this irony,
this dichotomy --
00:11:51.860 --> 00:11:56.560
literally of black
and white, you know --
00:11:56.560 --> 00:12:00.400
I filed suit against the
State of Tennessee and I said,
00:12:00.400 --> 00:12:04.330
we need to make courthouses
in Tennessee accessible
00:12:04.330 --> 00:12:09.379
no matter what your character
is, no matter who you are,
00:12:09.379 --> 00:12:10.795
no matter what
your disability is.
00:12:15.480 --> 00:12:19.080
I must admit I was
very naive back then.
00:12:19.080 --> 00:12:20.460
I said to myself --
00:12:20.460 --> 00:12:23.400
and I've had so many people
tell me this before --
00:12:23.400 --> 00:12:26.040
you know, this is so obvious.
00:12:26.040 --> 00:12:27.420
How could...
00:12:27.420 --> 00:12:32.610
how could you possibly
lose this one?
00:12:32.610 --> 00:12:40.350
So I got a motion to dismiss
filed by the State of Tennessee
00:12:40.350 --> 00:12:42.980
about 30 days later.
00:12:42.980 --> 00:12:46.080
And they raised the issue
saying that the Americans
00:12:46.080 --> 00:12:53.150
with Disabilities Act violated
sovereign immunity, imposed
00:12:53.150 --> 00:12:58.780
on the State's rights, and asked
the court to dismiss our claim.
00:13:03.420 --> 00:13:05.990
And I said, well, I
don't guess they're
00:13:05.990 --> 00:13:09.180
going to concede this one.
00:13:09.180 --> 00:13:12.480
You know, they didn't say
that what we said was false
00:13:12.480 --> 00:13:15.310
or really the State
was in compliance,
00:13:15.310 --> 00:13:17.750
that everything was hunky-dory.
00:13:17.750 --> 00:13:22.180
No, they said, "We're
the State of Tennessee,
00:13:22.180 --> 00:13:27.400
and you can't make us do
what we don't want to do."
00:13:27.400 --> 00:13:30.910
- The State was claiming it was
protected by sovereign immunity
00:13:30.910 --> 00:13:34.230
from individuals suing
it for monetary damages,
00:13:34.230 --> 00:13:39.250
as granted under the 11th
Amendment of the Constitution.
00:13:39.250 --> 00:13:44.950
- It's an amendment that was
designed to protect states
00:13:44.950 --> 00:13:47.000
against being sued.
00:13:47.000 --> 00:13:51.940
And there was this kind
of concept in English law
00:13:51.940 --> 00:13:54.520
that was inherited
in the United States,
00:13:54.520 --> 00:13:56.560
that you couldn't sue the king.
00:13:56.560 --> 00:14:01.180
You couldn't sue the sovereign,
unless the king or sovereigns,
00:14:01.180 --> 00:14:05.980
you know, granted
you that authority.
00:14:05.980 --> 00:14:09.400
- On November 10, 1998,
a federal district court
00:14:09.400 --> 00:14:11.740
in Nashville denies
Tennessee's motion
00:14:11.740 --> 00:14:14.850
to dismiss Bill's lawsuit.
00:14:14.850 --> 00:14:17.520
30 days later, the
State files an appeal
00:14:17.520 --> 00:14:22.050
to the Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals in Cincinnati, Ohio.
00:14:22.050 --> 00:14:25.830
- Well when they took their
appeal to the Sixth Circuit,
00:14:25.830 --> 00:14:29.910
one of the things that I
said to both the AG's office
00:14:29.910 --> 00:14:33.180
and to these counties was,
while we're dealing with this
00:14:33.180 --> 00:14:37.650
sovereign immunity issue, could
we go ahead and start to see
00:14:37.650 --> 00:14:41.100
whether or not we can
get Tennessee's program
00:14:41.100 --> 00:14:44.700
in compliance with the Americans
with Disabilities Act --
00:14:44.700 --> 00:14:48.060
at least have some kind of a
situation where people can get
00:14:48.060 --> 00:14:50.730
accommodations?
00:14:50.730 --> 00:14:53.160
And they told me
that, no, they wanted
00:14:53.160 --> 00:14:54.833
to wait till the case was over.
00:14:57.491 --> 00:15:01.070
And so I knew at
that point in time
00:15:01.070 --> 00:15:03.730
that they really didn't get it.
00:15:07.330 --> 00:15:09.160
Their defense of
sovereign immunity
00:15:09.160 --> 00:15:13.530
was more important than the
dignity of their citizens
00:15:13.530 --> 00:15:16.060
being able to get to court.
00:15:16.060 --> 00:15:18.010
- Despite winning in
the district court,
00:15:18.010 --> 00:15:21.370
new rulings handed down from
other federal courthouses
00:15:21.370 --> 00:15:23.620
would force Bill to
shift his strategy
00:15:23.620 --> 00:15:27.650
if he hoped to prevail
in the Sixth Circuit.
00:15:27.650 --> 00:15:29.360
- There's nothing
in the Constitution
00:15:29.360 --> 00:15:31.430
that suggests that
people with disabilities
00:15:31.430 --> 00:15:33.680
are special people.
00:15:33.680 --> 00:15:38.680
So the issue about arguing about
disabled people being special
00:15:38.680 --> 00:15:43.430
was probably not going
to be real compelling.
00:15:43.430 --> 00:15:48.680
So what did we have that
could make it compelling?
00:15:48.680 --> 00:15:52.460
Well, what made it
compelling is to discuss
00:15:52.460 --> 00:15:54.590
about a fundamental right.
00:15:54.590 --> 00:15:57.470
- Claiming that everyone has
a fundamental right of access
00:15:57.470 --> 00:15:59.720
to the courts based
on the due process
00:15:59.720 --> 00:16:02.180
clause of the 14th
Amendment, Bill
00:16:02.180 --> 00:16:04.730
waits over four
years for a decision
00:16:04.730 --> 00:16:06.530
from the Sixth Circuit.
00:16:06.530 --> 00:16:09.420
But he would again
be victorious.
00:16:09.420 --> 00:16:12.930
- The Sixth Circuit
makes its decision,
00:16:12.930 --> 00:16:14.670
and I thought, well,
maybe now we'll
00:16:14.670 --> 00:16:16.080
get some progress on this.
00:16:18.870 --> 00:16:22.320
And then I got an application
for writ of certiorari
00:16:22.320 --> 00:16:26.045
to the United States
Supreme Court.
00:16:26.045 --> 00:16:32.030
And I thought, oh, my
goodness, this country lawyer
00:16:32.030 --> 00:16:34.975
at 23 North Ocoee Street
in Cleveland, Tennessee,
00:16:34.975 --> 00:16:37.690
arguing over a courthouse in
one of the smallest counties
00:16:37.690 --> 00:16:40.600
in the country, is now
going to be arguing
00:16:40.600 --> 00:16:42.160
about a fundamental
right of access
00:16:42.160 --> 00:16:48.310
to the courts in the most
important court of our country.
00:16:48.310 --> 00:16:50.920
- The question before
the Supreme Court
00:16:50.920 --> 00:16:52.930
would be whether
Congress had properly
00:16:52.930 --> 00:16:56.680
abrogated state's right to
sovereign immunity under Title
00:16:56.680 --> 00:17:00.250
II of the ADA, thereby
allowing individuals
00:17:00.250 --> 00:17:03.220
to sue a state
for money damages.
00:17:03.220 --> 00:17:06.310
And while he had won in
the lower federal courts,
00:17:06.310 --> 00:17:08.950
Bill faced formidable
new obstacles.
00:17:11.810 --> 00:17:15.849
- This was a time at the time
when "Tennessee versus Lane"
00:17:15.849 --> 00:17:19.640
was decided that it looked
like the court was very
00:17:19.640 --> 00:17:24.079
aggressively limiting Congress'
power to enact civil rights
00:17:24.079 --> 00:17:25.339
legislation.
00:17:25.339 --> 00:17:28.820
- A conservative-leaning court
led by Chief Justice William
00:17:28.820 --> 00:17:33.260
Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia
had issued a number of 5-4
00:17:33.260 --> 00:17:36.927
decisions limiting civil rights,
and sometimes finding whole
00:17:36.927 --> 00:17:40.610
sections of the ADA to
be unconstitutional.
00:17:40.610 --> 00:17:43.310
- I think people were concerned
about the outcome in "Tennessee
00:17:43.310 --> 00:17:46.380
versus Lane" for a
number of reasons.
00:17:46.380 --> 00:17:50.120
First, the result in "Garrett."
00:17:50.120 --> 00:17:53.030
- In "The University of
Alabama versus Garrett,"
00:17:53.030 --> 00:17:56.630
the Supreme Court had just
found Title I of the ADA to be
00:17:56.630 --> 00:18:01.130
unconstitutional, claiming
they saw no widespread evidence
00:18:01.130 --> 00:18:03.420
of discrimination
in employment --
00:18:03.420 --> 00:18:05.340
preventing persons
with disabilities
00:18:05.340 --> 00:18:09.090
from being able to sue
employers for money damages.
00:18:09.090 --> 00:18:15.630
- And the "Garrett" decision had
really, in many people's minds,
00:18:15.630 --> 00:18:17.770
put a dagger in the ADA.
00:18:17.770 --> 00:18:22.970
- The concern in
"Lane" was far more
00:18:22.970 --> 00:18:26.570
than whether this injured
party, this injured person
00:18:26.570 --> 00:18:29.580
with a disability, would
be able to achieve damages.
00:18:29.580 --> 00:18:35.510
It was really about the
constitutionality of the ADA
00:18:35.510 --> 00:18:38.350
as a whole.
00:18:38.350 --> 00:18:39.970
- Although "Tennessee
versus Lane"
00:18:39.970 --> 00:18:43.250
was being argued under
Title II of the ADA,
00:18:43.250 --> 00:18:44.830
the fear was that
the court would
00:18:44.830 --> 00:18:47.950
apply the same lack of evidence
of discrimination found
00:18:47.950 --> 00:18:52.210
in "Garrett" to also find Title
II to be unconstitutional,
00:18:52.210 --> 00:18:56.350
effectively dismantling the ADA
and the rights of 55 million
00:18:56.350 --> 00:18:57.790
people with disabilities.
00:19:00.570 --> 00:19:02.730
- When we get to
the Supreme Court
00:19:02.730 --> 00:19:06.900
and we start talking about
where we are up there, well,
00:19:06.900 --> 00:19:09.090
you know, the math
is pretty simple.
00:19:09.090 --> 00:19:11.820
You gotta count to five.
00:19:11.820 --> 00:19:14.760
- Faced with a string
of recent 5-4 losses,
00:19:14.760 --> 00:19:16.860
an increasingly
conservative court,
00:19:16.860 --> 00:19:19.290
and an ADA legislation
under attack,
00:19:19.290 --> 00:19:22.290
a key strategic decision
becomes to argue the case
00:19:22.290 --> 00:19:27.300
on an as-applied basis, focusing
just on access to courthouses
00:19:27.300 --> 00:19:29.610
in the hopes of getting
the vote of at least one
00:19:29.610 --> 00:19:33.120
of the court's two
moderate justices.
00:19:33.120 --> 00:19:36.360
- I mean generally in civil
rights cases, Justice Kennedy
00:19:36.360 --> 00:19:38.690
and Justice O'Connor
were the swing votes.
00:19:38.690 --> 00:19:43.440
And litigants before the
court and the advocates
00:19:43.440 --> 00:19:44.930
of communities
that supported them
00:19:44.930 --> 00:19:50.160
would tailor their arguments
to one or the other or both.
00:19:50.160 --> 00:19:53.610
In the context of
"Tennessee versus Lane,"
00:19:53.610 --> 00:19:55.650
we were worried
about Justice Kennedy
00:19:55.650 --> 00:20:00.780
because he was a
very strong proponent
00:20:00.780 --> 00:20:06.270
of limited federal powers
of what's called federalism.
00:20:06.270 --> 00:20:10.530
- In the "Garrett" decision,
Sandra Day O'Connor
00:20:10.530 --> 00:20:16.740
had gone with the conservative
side of the court.
00:20:16.740 --> 00:20:19.890
I did a lot of reading...
a lot of reading.
00:20:19.890 --> 00:20:21.390
And one of the
things that struck me
00:20:21.390 --> 00:20:26.580
about Justice
O'Connor was that she
00:20:26.580 --> 00:20:37.140
had been a state trial-level
judge in Maricopa, Arizona.
00:20:37.140 --> 00:20:38.280
You know, I can...
00:20:38.280 --> 00:20:44.320
I could just imagine that in her
years on the trial-level bench,
00:20:44.320 --> 00:20:47.010
she had to deal with
and address issues of,
00:20:47.010 --> 00:20:52.530
how am I going to get that
person to the courtroom?
00:20:52.530 --> 00:20:54.360
Is it a witness?
00:20:54.360 --> 00:20:55.890
Is it a defendant?
00:20:55.890 --> 00:20:57.510
Is it a plaintiff?
00:20:57.510 --> 00:20:59.820
Is it a juror?
00:20:59.820 --> 00:21:02.550
And I know how important it
is to make sure that everybody
00:21:02.550 --> 00:21:05.600
gets to THE courtroom.
00:21:05.600 --> 00:21:10.380
And so I knew that our
best shot was probably
00:21:10.380 --> 00:21:13.170
winning Sandra Day O'Connor.
00:21:13.170 --> 00:21:17.670
- On December 8, 2003, just one
month before the Supreme Court
00:21:17.670 --> 00:21:19.710
hearing, Bill goes
to Washington,
00:21:19.710 --> 00:21:22.260
DC, to attend his
first moot court
00:21:22.260 --> 00:21:24.210
in front of nine of
the most prominent
00:21:24.210 --> 00:21:26.400
constitutional scholars
in the country.
00:21:28.920 --> 00:21:31.080
- For about two hours...
00:21:31.080 --> 00:21:33.840
now remember, my argument
in the court is 15 minutes,
00:21:33.840 --> 00:21:37.770
but for two hours
I just kept getting
00:21:37.770 --> 00:21:40.320
bombarded with questions,
one right after the other.
00:21:43.240 --> 00:21:49.770
And, um, finally, we
came to a conclusion.
00:21:53.890 --> 00:21:59.060
And all of them got up
without saying a word
00:21:59.060 --> 00:22:00.184
and walked out of the room.
00:22:07.930 --> 00:22:12.145
So Tom came in, and he sat down.
00:22:12.145 --> 00:22:16.780
And he looked at me
and he said, "Bill,
00:22:16.780 --> 00:22:25.830
everybody thinks that this
case involves the future
00:22:25.830 --> 00:22:28.920
of 55 million Americans.
00:22:33.770 --> 00:22:35.694
And we don't think
you're able to do it."
00:22:38.600 --> 00:22:42.250
- Here, you know, there
was a lawyer from Tennessee
00:22:42.250 --> 00:22:45.790
who had brought this case
and was very committed to it,
00:22:45.790 --> 00:22:48.910
very passionate about
it, but had never
00:22:48.910 --> 00:22:50.891
litigated in the Supreme Court.
00:22:50.891 --> 00:22:52.390
And one of the
things that sort of I
00:22:52.390 --> 00:22:55.000
learned when I first got
involved in Supreme Court
00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:57.220
advocacy is that
the Supreme Court
00:22:57.220 --> 00:22:59.710
is as different from
the Court of Appeals
00:22:59.710 --> 00:23:05.000
as the Court of Appeals
are from the trial courts.
00:23:05.000 --> 00:23:09.562
- It was a very cold
day, a very dark day.
00:23:09.562 --> 00:23:11.520
And I picked up my
briefcase, and I walked back
00:23:11.520 --> 00:23:14.070
to my hotel room.
00:23:14.070 --> 00:23:17.370
And I didn't sleep
much that night.
00:23:17.370 --> 00:23:19.890
That was probably
one of the lowest
00:23:19.890 --> 00:23:24.635
periods I'd ever had in the
years that I'd practiced law.
00:23:27.750 --> 00:23:29.860
And I called my
clients the next day.
00:23:29.860 --> 00:23:33.120
I called George, and
I called Beverly.
00:23:33.120 --> 00:23:36.734
And I'll never forget
what George said.
00:23:36.734 --> 00:23:38.400
George said, "Bill,
I don't want anybody
00:23:38.400 --> 00:23:41.670
but you to argue this case."
00:23:41.670 --> 00:23:44.020
He says, "I don't
know those people."
00:23:44.020 --> 00:23:46.410
He said, "They don't know me.
00:23:46.410 --> 00:23:49.050
They don't know
what the facts are."
00:23:49.050 --> 00:23:50.966
And he says, "I want
you to argue it."
00:23:54.440 --> 00:23:56.483
- He was always clear
and to the point.
00:23:56.483 --> 00:23:58.640
And he had an attitude.
00:23:58.640 --> 00:24:01.650
He had red hair, you know.
00:24:01.650 --> 00:24:03.500
And most redheads...
00:24:03.500 --> 00:24:06.096
I don't want to stereotype
it, but, you know,
00:24:06.096 --> 00:24:08.930
they're about their business.
00:24:08.930 --> 00:24:10.840
- So I decided at
that point in time
00:24:10.840 --> 00:24:19.742
that, despite my deficiencies,
that I was going to work hard
00:24:19.742 --> 00:24:21.200
and I was going to
argue this case.
00:24:26.070 --> 00:24:30.453
(SOFT PIANO MUSIC PLAYING)
00:24:36.810 --> 00:24:39.600
The day came.
00:24:39.600 --> 00:24:41.920
My whole family, my
office staff came up.
00:24:44.820 --> 00:24:47.580
My sister took us all out
to dinner the night before,
00:24:47.580 --> 00:24:53.400
and I woke up about
5:30 in the morning
00:24:53.400 --> 00:24:54.900
and I started putting
my clothes on.
00:24:54.900 --> 00:24:59.020
And my wife rolled over, and
she said, "What are you doing?"
00:24:59.020 --> 00:25:01.320
And I said, well, I'm
putting my clothes on.
00:25:01.320 --> 00:25:03.690
I'm getting ready to
go argue this case.
00:25:03.690 --> 00:25:06.870
She said, "It's 5:30
in the morning."
00:25:06.870 --> 00:25:09.660
She said, "Your clothes
will be so wrinkled they'll
00:25:09.660 --> 00:25:12.780
think you're just a bumpkin.
00:25:12.780 --> 00:25:15.810
Get those off."
00:25:15.810 --> 00:25:18.030
So I took my clothes
off, and I sat there
00:25:18.030 --> 00:25:22.224
for the next two and a
half hours in my underwear.
00:25:22.224 --> 00:25:26.970
(DRAMATIC MUSIC PLAYING)
00:25:26.970 --> 00:25:29.910
- A few minutes into the
hearing, Sandra Day O'Connor
00:25:29.910 --> 00:25:32.850
asks her first question to
Tennessee Solicitor General
00:25:32.850 --> 00:25:34.050
Michael Moore.
00:25:34.050 --> 00:25:40.290
- Mr. Moore, does Tennessee
provide any cause of action
00:25:40.290 --> 00:25:43.110
for the alleged
violations here, the lack
00:25:43.110 --> 00:25:44.930
of access to the courthouse?
00:25:44.930 --> 00:25:48.360
- Uh, no private right of
action under our State Public
00:25:48.360 --> 00:25:49.020
Buildings Act.
00:25:49.020 --> 00:25:51.720
- So you're satisfied,
then, under Tennessee law
00:25:51.720 --> 00:25:54.870
there would be no
monetary relief available.
00:25:54.870 --> 00:25:55.754
- I think that is...
00:25:55.754 --> 00:25:56.670
I think that is right.
00:25:56.670 --> 00:25:57.170
Uh...
00:25:57.170 --> 00:25:59.310
- And would there
be any enforcement
00:25:59.310 --> 00:26:03.970
action at all available to
compel, under Tennessee law,
00:26:03.970 --> 00:26:06.780
the courthouses
to be accessible?
00:26:06.780 --> 00:26:08.520
- Uh, no, Your Honor.
00:26:08.520 --> 00:26:12.990
- She understood and
appreciated that the only way
00:26:12.990 --> 00:26:16.350
that my clients
would have an ability
00:26:16.350 --> 00:26:20.400
to make their
circumstances compatible
00:26:20.400 --> 00:26:23.990
with the Constitution was
through an act of Congress.
00:26:26.610 --> 00:26:29.700
And then I got to do my
15 minutes of argument.
00:26:29.700 --> 00:26:36.200
And I, uh, had probably close
to eight words out of my mouth
00:26:36.200 --> 00:26:41.900
when Justice Rehnquist, in his
very deep and authoritative
00:26:41.900 --> 00:26:45.110
voice, comes out and
says, (ADOPTS DEEP VOICE)
00:26:45.110 --> 00:26:49.580
"Mr. Brown, I thought we had
already resolved these issues
00:26:49.580 --> 00:26:50.735
in the 'Boerne' case."
00:26:53.340 --> 00:26:57.420
And I said, well,
you better be ready.
00:26:57.420 --> 00:27:02.940
Justice Scalia, of
course, was the most, um,
00:27:02.940 --> 00:27:05.120
persistent and negative.
00:27:05.120 --> 00:27:08.460
One of his questions
posed, "Do you
00:27:08.460 --> 00:27:12.150
have a constitutional right to
have a hockey rink accessible?"
00:27:12.150 --> 00:27:15.760
Hockey rinks didn't have
anything to do with this case.
00:27:19.050 --> 00:27:21.975
And wouldn't it have been
terrible if the State
00:27:21.975 --> 00:27:24.225
of Tennessee could have
forced George Lane to crawl up
00:27:24.225 --> 00:27:27.360
the steps because we were
worried about whether or not
00:27:27.360 --> 00:27:30.060
handicapped people
could go see a hockey
00:27:30.060 --> 00:27:33.080
game in a state-supported
hockey rink?
00:27:35.690 --> 00:27:38.730
What really would
have been ironic
00:27:38.730 --> 00:27:41.580
is that, at least in
Tennessee, that we
00:27:41.580 --> 00:27:44.640
don't have any
state-supported hockey rinks.
00:27:44.640 --> 00:27:47.730
- We therefore go no further
than the precise question that
00:27:47.730 --> 00:27:49.500
this case presents --
00:27:49.500 --> 00:27:51.990
whether Title II
appropriately enforces
00:27:51.990 --> 00:27:55.110
the constitutional right
of access to the court.
00:27:55.110 --> 00:27:56.910
We hold that it does.
00:27:56.910 --> 00:27:58.980
Title II requires
public entities
00:27:58.980 --> 00:28:02.340
to make reasonable
modifications to permit
00:28:02.340 --> 00:28:05.100
persons with disabilities
to participate
00:28:05.100 --> 00:28:07.320
in judicial proceedings.
00:28:07.320 --> 00:28:09.780
This duty to make
reasonable accommodations
00:28:09.780 --> 00:28:13.350
is perfectly consistent with
the well-established principle
00:28:13.350 --> 00:28:17.640
that states must afford all
individuals a meaningful right
00:28:17.640 --> 00:28:19.470
to be heard in court.
00:28:19.470 --> 00:28:21.840
So the judgment of the Court
of Appeals is affirmed.
00:28:26.510 --> 00:28:29.400
- As you know, we
have nine justices.
00:28:29.400 --> 00:28:32.800
I got five votes.
00:28:32.800 --> 00:28:37.170
You know, I'm an uneducated
man, but come on.
00:28:37.170 --> 00:28:40.160
These people...
00:28:40.160 --> 00:28:40.820
I don't get it.
00:28:40.820 --> 00:28:43.070
I just don't get it.
00:28:43.070 --> 00:28:48.020
You know, I understood it
on the level of Polk County,
00:28:48.020 --> 00:28:51.370
but you'd have to be there to
understand that's acceptable
00:28:51.370 --> 00:28:56.320
or they would be that
ignorant to the fact.
00:28:56.320 --> 00:28:59.540
But not at the Supreme Court.
00:28:59.540 --> 00:29:02.570
- After the verdict, State
Attorney General Paul Summers
00:29:02.570 --> 00:29:06.200
issues a written response to
the Supreme Court's decision.
00:29:06.200 --> 00:29:08.990
In it, Summers says that
the State of Tennessee
00:29:08.990 --> 00:29:11.600
has conceded from the
outset that the Americans
00:29:11.600 --> 00:29:14.500
with Disabilities
Act applies to it.
00:29:14.500 --> 00:29:19.520
- So why did we have to
wait six years for them
00:29:19.520 --> 00:29:22.700
to suddenly start to say,
"We're willing to come
00:29:22.700 --> 00:29:25.280
into compliance?"
00:29:25.280 --> 00:29:27.950
- General Summers'
response continues that,
00:29:27.950 --> 00:29:30.980
"...as a practical matter,
this outcome is exactly what
00:29:30.980 --> 00:29:33.530
the plaintiffs could have
obtained from the State had
00:29:33.530 --> 00:29:36.650
they sued under Ex parte
Young, rather than going
00:29:36.650 --> 00:29:40.040
to the Supreme Court to
seek monetary damages."
00:29:40.040 --> 00:29:42.740
- How many people
out there had already
00:29:42.740 --> 00:29:47.630
gone through this process of
having their fundamental rights
00:29:47.630 --> 00:29:51.020
of access to the courts
denied because they couldn't
00:29:51.020 --> 00:29:53.660
get anybody to listen to them?
00:29:53.660 --> 00:29:57.770
Hey, listen, I'd been practicing
law in the state of Tennessee
00:29:57.770 --> 00:30:01.510
for probably close to 15
years at that point in time.
00:30:01.510 --> 00:30:04.160
And despite the fact that I
took an appeal to the Tennessee
00:30:04.160 --> 00:30:06.941
Court of Appeals, the
Tennessee Supreme Court,
00:30:06.941 --> 00:30:08.690
and wrote letters to
the Attorney General,
00:30:08.690 --> 00:30:13.400
even I couldn't get
their attention.
00:30:13.400 --> 00:30:15.850
The only way you get their
attention is if they say,
00:30:15.850 --> 00:30:19.120
"Somebody is going to
have to pay for this."
00:30:19.120 --> 00:30:20.950
- But in spite of
the great victory,
00:30:20.950 --> 00:30:22.780
all the Supreme
Court decision did
00:30:22.780 --> 00:30:25.300
was give George Lane
and the other plaintiffs
00:30:25.300 --> 00:30:29.330
the right to sue the State
for monetary damages.
00:30:29.330 --> 00:30:32.020
Now nearly eight
years into the case,
00:30:32.020 --> 00:30:35.320
Bill tries to finally reach a
settlement on his original goal
00:30:35.320 --> 00:30:38.770
to simply make the
courthouses accessible.
00:30:38.770 --> 00:30:41.950
- And it wasn't always easy,
and it was all... it wasn't...
00:30:41.950 --> 00:30:45.280
most of the time it
was very frustrating.
00:30:45.280 --> 00:30:48.330
Because the burden of
proof is on the plaintiff.
00:30:48.330 --> 00:30:50.580
And we were the plaintiff.
00:30:50.580 --> 00:30:52.380
- The issues were pretty clear.
00:30:52.380 --> 00:30:53.800
People with mobility
disabilities
00:30:53.800 --> 00:30:56.940
couldn't get into courthouses
and therefore access
00:30:56.940 --> 00:30:58.410
the court program.
00:30:58.410 --> 00:31:01.170
And the Counties and
States' attorneys
00:31:01.170 --> 00:31:04.390
kept focusing more
on our clients,
00:31:04.390 --> 00:31:07.290
like, "Oh, my goodness,
George has a criminal record.
00:31:07.290 --> 00:31:09.390
Let's talk about that
during the deposition."
00:31:09.390 --> 00:31:11.306
Well, that didn't have
anything to do with it.
00:31:11.306 --> 00:31:15.350
- A plaintiff's personal
history, it is always...
00:31:15.350 --> 00:31:20.660
always important in the eyes of
the jury when they're awarding
00:31:20.660 --> 00:31:23.030
compensatory
damages, because one
00:31:23.030 --> 00:31:26.315
of the things that the jury's
going to think about is,
00:31:26.315 --> 00:31:32.760
is this particular
plaintiff entitled or worthy
00:31:32.760 --> 00:31:38.280
to this monetary damage that
he's asking the jury to award?
00:31:38.280 --> 00:31:42.150
- There was, I think, some
attempt to bait the plaintiffs
00:31:42.150 --> 00:31:44.070
and get them angry.
00:31:44.070 --> 00:31:49.400
- It's always a strategy
to get a deponent
00:31:49.400 --> 00:31:51.560
to tell you the truth.
00:31:51.560 --> 00:31:54.590
- In his deposition, George
Lane is asked three times
00:31:54.590 --> 00:31:57.680
by three different lawyers,
including John Nefflen,
00:31:57.680 --> 00:31:59.450
if he stopped
anywhere before going
00:31:59.450 --> 00:32:02.540
home the night of the accident,
with one attorney even
00:32:02.540 --> 00:32:05.110
directly asking if he
went to get a drink.
00:32:05.110 --> 00:32:08.340
- By the grace of God, at
the time of my car accident
00:32:08.340 --> 00:32:11.970
I had been sober for 18 months.
00:32:11.970 --> 00:32:16.320
- George's character was
made an important issue.
00:32:16.320 --> 00:32:21.477
Not that it was and not that it
should have been, but it was.
00:32:21.477 --> 00:32:27.960
The, uh, the pictures that
were in the paper of George
00:32:27.960 --> 00:32:37.360
were of George in prison garb
with crutches, and saying,
00:32:37.360 --> 00:32:39.766
"This is the lead plaintiff."
00:32:39.766 --> 00:32:42.150
We didn't get many
pictures of Beverly
00:32:42.150 --> 00:32:45.160
from some of the news media.
00:32:45.160 --> 00:32:47.950
In the discussions,
deliberations,
00:32:47.950 --> 00:32:52.670
and debate that we had
about who had standing,
00:32:52.670 --> 00:32:55.940
9 times out of 10 the only place
I could get everybody to agree
00:32:55.940 --> 00:32:58.490
on -- including
the other side --
00:32:58.490 --> 00:33:02.140
was that criminal
defendants, who
00:33:02.140 --> 00:33:06.910
are the ones that are forced
to be in court, have that right
00:33:06.910 --> 00:33:10.600
and have the most
logical standing.
00:33:10.600 --> 00:33:14.590
Is it not incredibly ironic
that the people that we
00:33:14.590 --> 00:33:17.650
may hold in the
most disdain may be
00:33:17.650 --> 00:33:22.710
the people that fundamentally
protect all of our rights?
00:33:22.710 --> 00:33:26.400
So the whole point
of the matter is
00:33:26.400 --> 00:33:30.900
this law, the Americans
with Disabilities Act,
00:33:30.900 --> 00:33:36.240
is not about the character
of disabled people.
00:33:36.240 --> 00:33:40.680
It is about our
responsibility as a society
00:33:40.680 --> 00:33:43.980
to treat people
with disabilities
00:33:43.980 --> 00:33:47.160
in a manner that is
respectful, no matter what
00:33:47.160 --> 00:33:48.860
their character is.
00:33:48.860 --> 00:33:49.860
- And I just knew...
00:33:49.860 --> 00:33:56.940
I just knew with every fiber of
me that I was doing the right
00:33:56.940 --> 00:34:05.710
thing -- in spite of the jail
terms or the bogus charges,
00:34:05.710 --> 00:34:10.030
you know, could not go to the
grocery store in my hometown.
00:34:10.030 --> 00:34:15.239
In spite of all that, I
was doing the right thing.
00:34:15.239 --> 00:34:17.995
- And I remember one of the
first meetings I had with Bill,
00:34:17.995 --> 00:34:20.746
he kept talking about,
"This was really important.
00:34:20.746 --> 00:34:21.870
It's more than courthouses.
00:34:21.870 --> 00:34:24.340
It's about the rule of law."
00:34:24.340 --> 00:34:31.210
- We make the rules before
we get into enforcing them.
00:34:31.210 --> 00:34:35.620
And, therefore, everybody
knows what the rules are.
00:34:35.620 --> 00:34:39.429
And with that notice,
everybody needs
00:34:39.429 --> 00:34:40.870
to come into
compliance with them
00:34:40.870 --> 00:34:43.719
or at least understand the
consequences if they don't
00:34:43.719 --> 00:34:46.570
come into compliance with them.
00:34:46.570 --> 00:34:51.010
And the beauty of that
is that the law is then
00:34:51.010 --> 00:34:55.830
decided on principles, not
the nature of the individuals
00:34:55.830 --> 00:34:58.660
that the principles
are being applied to.
00:34:58.660 --> 00:35:01.132
- It's about the
importance of, the law
00:35:01.132 --> 00:35:02.215
has to apply to everybody.
00:35:02.215 --> 00:35:03.750
It applies to counties.
00:35:03.750 --> 00:35:04.870
It applies to states.
00:35:04.870 --> 00:35:08.470
It applies to Beverly and
George and anybody else.
00:35:08.470 --> 00:35:10.780
And people get treated equally.
00:35:10.780 --> 00:35:15.680
- When does the law
apply to the government?
00:35:15.680 --> 00:35:17.950
When does the law apply
to these people that
00:35:17.950 --> 00:35:22.360
are applying the law to us, who
are passing the laws that we
00:35:22.360 --> 00:35:24.280
have to comply with?
00:35:24.280 --> 00:35:28.090
And in the broad
spectrum of things,
00:35:28.090 --> 00:35:34.697
who has the authority and power
to hold government responsible?
00:35:34.697 --> 00:35:36.530
Well, when you talk
about sovereign immunity
00:35:36.530 --> 00:35:39.120
and the principles
behind sovereign immunity
00:35:39.120 --> 00:35:43.690
and the common law basis, you
know, the king can do no wrong.
00:35:43.690 --> 00:35:45.220
- Sometimes you
would call a county
00:35:45.220 --> 00:35:48.940
and find out that they're
supposed ADA coordinator was
00:35:48.940 --> 00:35:52.500
a janitor who didn't know he
or she was the ADA coordinator.
00:35:52.500 --> 00:35:55.750
So that was... that
was always interesting.
00:35:55.750 --> 00:35:57.670
- And we finally
negotiated out what
00:35:57.670 --> 00:36:04.930
came to become the most
preeminent policy that
00:36:04.930 --> 00:36:08.680
was used by most of
the states thereafter,
00:36:08.680 --> 00:36:13.270
in terms of bringing their
own "access to the courts"
00:36:13.270 --> 00:36:15.310
policies into play.
00:36:15.310 --> 00:36:19.870
- Ultimately, 9 years after
George Lane crawled up the Polk
00:36:19.870 --> 00:36:23.800
County courthouse stairs, 26
settlements are reached with
00:36:23.800 --> 00:36:27.670
the State and Counties -- with
22 counties agreeing to make
00:36:27.670 --> 00:36:29.890
their courthouses
fully accessible,
00:36:29.890 --> 00:36:33.130
and the remaining 3 agreeing
to follow the new statewide
00:36:33.130 --> 00:36:37.930
judicial ADA access policy
negotiated by Bill and Martie.
00:36:37.930 --> 00:36:39.680
- The nice thing
about this, though,
00:36:39.680 --> 00:36:42.790
is that our state now has
specific ADA coordinators
00:36:42.790 --> 00:36:43.870
for the court program.
00:36:43.870 --> 00:36:47.790
And that's something beyond
what the ADA itself requires.
00:36:47.790 --> 00:36:49.360
- When they call
the courthouses,
00:36:49.360 --> 00:36:52.990
there's somebody that knows what
to do now instead of everybody
00:36:52.990 --> 00:36:55.750
doing the Keystone Cop thing
about what we're going to do
00:36:55.750 --> 00:36:57.291
and how we're going
to deal with them
00:36:57.291 --> 00:36:59.230
and how we're going
to get them up there.
00:36:59.230 --> 00:37:02.950
- Several counties also agreed
to pay modest monetary damages
00:37:02.950 --> 00:37:06.220
to five of the plaintiffs,
the only exception being
00:37:06.220 --> 00:37:10.690
Beverly Jones' case against Clay
County, which goes to trial.
00:37:10.690 --> 00:37:13.672
- "OK, yeah, she couldn't get
into our courtroom herself,
00:37:13.672 --> 00:37:15.130
so we picked her
up and carried her
00:37:15.130 --> 00:37:17.560
because that's the kind of
neighborly folk we are."
00:37:17.560 --> 00:37:19.191
That was their defense.
00:37:19.191 --> 00:37:21.190
- As a defense attorney,
you're looking for ways
00:37:21.190 --> 00:37:24.580
to minimize the effect
of the alleged injury
00:37:24.580 --> 00:37:28.490
and, as a result,
hopefully minimize
00:37:28.490 --> 00:37:31.300
any money you pay
for that injury.
00:37:31.300 --> 00:37:35.230
- And so we... we knew going
into that trial that it
00:37:35.230 --> 00:37:38.230
wasn't likely she would
get a lot of money from it.
00:37:38.230 --> 00:37:41.740
But we all thought they would
say, "Of course the county
00:37:41.740 --> 00:37:42.910
violated the ADA."
00:37:42.910 --> 00:37:44.950
And we were just
really surprised
00:37:44.950 --> 00:37:47.050
when the jury comes
back and says,
00:37:47.050 --> 00:37:49.030
"No violation of the ADA."
00:37:49.030 --> 00:37:53.050
So you have all the relief
we got in the "Lane" case
00:37:53.050 --> 00:37:58.870
through settlements, and
those settlements have
00:37:58.870 --> 00:38:01.510
made the program accessible.
00:38:01.510 --> 00:38:03.956
And then you have this one
outlying decision that said no
00:38:03.956 --> 00:38:05.455
liability, which
makes you wonder --
00:38:05.455 --> 00:38:07.146
at least makes me wonder --
00:38:07.146 --> 00:38:08.770
what on Earth would
have happened if we
00:38:08.770 --> 00:38:10.120
hadn't gotten the settlements?
00:38:10.120 --> 00:38:12.590
I think the settlements
got the right result,
00:38:12.590 --> 00:38:16.150
but what if a whole
case had gone to a jury?
00:38:16.150 --> 00:38:18.686
What would have happened?
00:38:18.686 --> 00:38:23.130
(SOFT PIANO MUSIC PLAYING)
00:38:23.130 --> 00:38:29.460
- I would say that "Tennessee
versus Lane" established
00:38:29.460 --> 00:38:32.100
two very important things.
00:38:32.100 --> 00:38:41.900
One is that everyone
has a fundamental right
00:38:41.900 --> 00:38:44.360
to go to court.
00:38:44.360 --> 00:38:48.920
And if you don't think that
that was at serious risk,
00:38:48.920 --> 00:38:52.010
read the dissenting opinions.
00:38:52.010 --> 00:38:55.370
Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote
in his dissenting opinion
00:38:55.370 --> 00:38:57.440
that he saw nothing
in the Constitution
00:38:57.440 --> 00:38:59.300
that guaranteed the
right of everybody
00:38:59.300 --> 00:39:01.235
to go to court for
their own case.
00:39:05.820 --> 00:39:11.610
The second thing is, when the
courts evaluate these things
00:39:11.610 --> 00:39:14.760
they're going to focus
on what's important.
00:39:14.760 --> 00:39:18.000
And that is what is the case
that's before them, and who
00:39:18.000 --> 00:39:20.430
are the parties that
are before them,
00:39:20.430 --> 00:39:23.015
and what are the issues
that are before them.
00:39:23.015 --> 00:39:24.390
And we're not
going to be talking
00:39:24.390 --> 00:39:27.300
about esoteric things that
have absolutely nothing
00:39:27.300 --> 00:39:31.520
to do with the issue
that's before us.
00:39:31.520 --> 00:39:35.910
And in that way, I think
we have fundamentally
00:39:35.910 --> 00:39:39.030
established the
ability of Congress
00:39:39.030 --> 00:39:44.940
to make sure that states
comply with the Constitution.
00:39:44.940 --> 00:39:46.185
- Do I see more change?
00:39:46.185 --> 00:39:50.630
Do I see things
that ain't right?
00:39:50.630 --> 00:39:55.810
There's, you know, no gray areas
and no-brainer kind of thing?
00:39:55.810 --> 00:39:56.720
Do I see that?
00:39:56.720 --> 00:39:58.930
Yeah.
00:39:58.930 --> 00:40:02.770
Maybe I'll get placed in
a position to do something
00:40:02.770 --> 00:40:05.415
about that, too.
00:40:05.415 --> 00:40:07.339
Who knows?
00:40:07.339 --> 00:40:10.220
I can hope for the best.
00:40:10.220 --> 00:40:11.070
I say...
00:40:11.070 --> 00:40:13.840
I keep telling Martie --
00:40:13.840 --> 00:40:16.876
she's the attorney
here at DLAC --
00:40:16.876 --> 00:40:18.834
that I don't know if I
got another fight in me,
00:40:18.834 --> 00:40:20.700
but I'm sure I do, you know.
00:40:20.700 --> 00:40:21.225
I...
00:40:21.225 --> 00:40:22.100
I'm sure I do.
00:40:22.100 --> 00:40:24.860
If something came
about, yeah, I'd do it.
00:40:32.210 --> 00:40:36.470
- He always cared more about
other people than he did about
00:40:36.470 --> 00:40:39.200
himself, to the point that at
times he would make decisions
00:40:39.200 --> 00:40:44.140
that hurt himself in order to
help other... other people.
00:40:44.140 --> 00:40:46.650
You know, he could read
a story in the newspaper
00:40:46.650 --> 00:40:50.120
or see something on the news
and he would get very riled up,
00:40:50.120 --> 00:40:52.330
because somebody is being hurt.
00:40:52.330 --> 00:40:54.710
Whether it's somebody with
a disability or, you know,
00:40:54.710 --> 00:40:56.090
a child, he...
00:40:56.090 --> 00:41:00.220
he really had a heart
for kind of the underdog.
00:41:00.220 --> 00:41:03.320
- You know, thank God
there ain't 100,000 George
00:41:03.320 --> 00:41:05.630
Lanes in this world, you know?
00:41:05.630 --> 00:41:09.000
It's up to the individual
to stand up for theirself,
00:41:09.000 --> 00:41:11.255
take notice, you know?
00:41:11.255 --> 00:41:14.935
You get pushed and pushed,
or you can just see stuff,
00:41:14.935 --> 00:41:17.805
you know, that's just common.
00:41:17.805 --> 00:41:21.680
You know, you have to
stand up for yourself.
00:41:21.680 --> 00:41:25.112
matter what the cost is.
00:41:25.112 --> 00:41:27.360
Yeah, no matter
what the cost is.
00:41:27.360 --> 00:41:32.340
- He... he very much believed in
God and thought that his whole
00:41:32.340 --> 00:41:35.880
story, particularly the "Lane
versus Tennessee" piece of it,
00:41:35.880 --> 00:41:38.430
was very much a
God-centered thing for him.
00:41:38.430 --> 00:41:40.620
- You know, I sit
and talk to my God
00:41:40.620 --> 00:41:44.180
just like I would
sit and talk to you.
00:41:44.180 --> 00:41:45.835
And, uh...
00:41:45.835 --> 00:41:48.545
and He has somewhat a
sense of humor, you know.
00:41:48.545 --> 00:41:55.140
Who would think that God
would take an uneducated man
00:41:55.140 --> 00:41:58.265
with the history that
I had and put him
00:41:58.265 --> 00:42:03.120
in a position to be an advocate
for so many millions of people?
00:42:03.120 --> 00:42:06.480
You know, I guess he
thought I had the attitude.
00:42:06.480 --> 00:42:08.152
What do you think?
00:42:08.152 --> 00:42:09.040
- God?
00:42:09.040 --> 00:42:10.590
- Yeah.
00:42:10.590 --> 00:42:13.020
- And he was a
very humble person.
00:42:13.020 --> 00:42:15.330
And it always amazed me when
I would have him with me
00:42:15.330 --> 00:42:17.670
and introduce him to
somebody, and they
00:42:17.670 --> 00:42:20.310
would know who George was
because of the "Lane" case.
00:42:20.310 --> 00:42:22.200
And it always surprised him.
00:42:22.200 --> 00:42:25.230
He never had any idea
how important the case
00:42:25.230 --> 00:42:27.240
was, how important he was.
00:42:27.240 --> 00:42:31.445
And not only in Tennessee,
but across the country.
00:42:31.445 --> 00:42:31.945
Thanks.
00:42:41.060 --> 00:42:42.762
- George, um...
00:42:47.190 --> 00:42:52.050
George was a person that,
but for his personal demons,
00:42:52.050 --> 00:42:56.442
had a heart about as big as any
human I've ever met in my life.
00:43:00.780 --> 00:43:04.230
Of all the people
that I've represented
00:43:04.230 --> 00:43:06.750
and my experience
of knowing George,
00:43:06.750 --> 00:43:10.470
George was always prepared
to accept the fact
00:43:10.470 --> 00:43:12.390
that he had personal failures.
00:43:12.390 --> 00:43:19.800
And he was prepared to accept
responsibility for that.
00:43:19.800 --> 00:43:24.120
There is no doubt in my mind
that if the General Sessions
00:43:24.120 --> 00:43:27.870
judge had gone downstairs that
day, the first day, and said,
00:43:27.870 --> 00:43:31.350
"George, what do you want
to do about this case?"
00:43:31.350 --> 00:43:35.635
George would have said, "Judge,
I'll just plead guilty."
00:43:35.635 --> 00:43:37.010
And the judge
probably would have
00:43:37.010 --> 00:43:38.220
said, "Well, George,
you're going to have
00:43:38.220 --> 00:43:39.660
to do 48 hours in jail."
00:43:39.660 --> 00:43:41.996
And George would have said,
"Well, that's fine, Judge.
00:43:41.996 --> 00:43:43.620
When do you want me
to turn myself in?"
00:43:47.010 --> 00:43:51.810
George never, ever, ever
refused to accept responsibility
00:43:51.810 --> 00:43:53.820
for what he did.
00:43:53.820 --> 00:43:56.370
It was only when he
got pushed to the point
00:43:56.370 --> 00:44:02.910
of personal humiliation
and degradation
00:44:02.910 --> 00:44:07.860
and fear that he
reached out to try
00:44:07.860 --> 00:44:10.327
to find someone to protect him.
00:44:13.250 --> 00:44:22.610
And it was, um, one of the
great coincidences of my life
00:44:22.610 --> 00:44:24.140
that he elected me to do that.
00:44:27.180 --> 00:44:32.183
And, um, in many ways
I'm humbled by that.
00:44:38.470 --> 00:44:45.160
And but for George Lane,
and the circumstances
00:44:45.160 --> 00:44:49.150
that he confronted
and the humiliation
00:44:49.150 --> 00:44:53.590
that he experienced,
we may never
00:44:53.590 --> 00:44:57.590
have come to grips
in this country
00:44:57.590 --> 00:45:02.830
with the fundamental principle
that everybody has a right
00:45:02.830 --> 00:45:05.695
to appear in court in dignity.
00:45:09.200 --> 00:45:17.300
And that irony of a
person, who many people
00:45:17.300 --> 00:45:26.230
said had no character, gave
me, as a small-town lawyer,
00:45:26.230 --> 00:45:29.243
an opportunity to challenge
the character of our country.
00:45:33.410 --> 00:45:37.522
And hopefully make a difference.
00:45:37.522 --> 00:45:39.170
And I hope we have.
00:45:39.170 --> 00:45:43.420
(UPLIFTING MUSIC PLAYING)
Distributor: Bullfrog Films
Length: 47 minutes
Date: 2017
Genre: Expository
Language: English
Grade: 10 - 12, College, Adults
Color/BW:
Closed Captioning: Available
Interactive Transcript: Available
Public Performance Rights are available for this title.
Please log in to your public library's site to view this film.